Officially this is the first male artist I have encountered in this project. Why would that be?
- Are female artists more willing to express themselves in an exhibitionist way?
- Sexism is all too prevalent and this is way of getting their point across.
- The female artists, like the ones I have researched here, in my opinion are the Emily Pankhursts of their medium, trying to address the gender gap.
- Ladies are perhaps more honest and open.
- There is too much repression and they feel that they need to express themselves to achieve some form of emancipation.
- Ladies may care more about the meaning of photography rather than the aesthetics of composition and the perfect picture.
- They have more to tell than the men.
- May be this course wants me to think more widely. The majority of my studies so far have been on men, yet my all time favourite photographer is Sally Mann.
- May be ladies can make more of the mundane and be able to turn this into a storyline.
- Women are repressed.
- Women are happy not to conform to the traditional photographic norms.
Gender, age, angle, project, time of day, light, personal experiences, etc all have a bearing on our imagery, and this has been highlighted by the artists I have looked at.
This is not my favourite genre of photography, but it has a purpose and is one that certainly tells a story in its ‘own right, either with or without the photographer being in the shot.
I respect of Shafran’s work called Washing Up, this may be seen as a typically female job, by the sexist amongst us and will be one of the reasons his images contain no people. There is no reason at all why a man should shoot kitchen sink images if he so desires, in the same way a lady is free to shoot whatever she wants. However our minds, whether we like it or not, are governed by both conscious and unconscious bias, which sometimes is hard to expel.
In respect of they interesting, well that is an interesting question in itself. Normally I would view a full kitchen sink as simple and annoying, as normally I will do the washing up, but on this occasion I am lefty thinking what is it that he is trying to create. If there were people in the image, this would take up a large space in the frame and would detract from what he is showing us. I was not surprised these images were taken by a man, but I was surprised initially that someone could make an interning project out of such an area.
Are they interesting? Yes they are interning, by th change that takes place in the including what is on the windowsill and how life changes in his household. Do I like them as a series, possibly.
Again this is not my preferred genre.
Her images are very staged as suggested in one of her titles e.g. a Constructed Encounter.
The series portrait of the artist is a substituted self absented way of presenting herself, by using models posing as herself. She is the least exhibitionist of all the artists I have looked at in this part of the course and is still one that is making the case for femininity.
There is some of her work I do not like such as, I am a usual woman. Whilst I understand the principles behind the work and agree with it too, the work appears almost child like and I do not feel fully represents women. May be this is what she wanted us think.
Her images are all about the story and are not necessarily the most beatify images to look at. They are nothing like the work of Sally Mann, whose work I adore.
I am glad I have come across Maria’s work and will revisit it at some stage, but at the minute I am happy to move on.
This book is not related to photography, however it is a great example of literature relating to one project that is dearth my heart. That being the KL’s of the Nazis in the second world war.
I bought this book in Auschwitz for 55 Polish Zloty, which is approximately £11.
Unlike many of the books I have read on the subject, it is a relatively short book, consisting of 185 pages.
Primo Levi is an Italian Jew, he is a chemist by trade and he is a survivor by nature.
He spent approximately 12 months in Auschwitz and the book describes, by way of prose, the dehumanizing effect that the camps had on the inmates and their daily struggles and rituals which were all at the whim of the cowardly Nazis.
His description of the Kapos and other block leaders was particularly interesting and sad and it shows what levels we as a species can stoop to.
The book is really well written, as he intended, in simple English and is a testament to the courage of the inmates and how man can endure what is thrown at him/her.
The original title of the book was “If this is a man” and was changed to its current title by the American publishers. For me the original title is better.
I have read so many books on the KLs but this is one that I have enjoyed more than others, if that is intact the right way to describe this. There are no images to accompany the book, but the words conjure a myriad of images and will give me inspiration for my life and for my future studies.
You should read this book if you want to know what life was really like. Passion and intensity abound in the book and there is never any form of self-pity from him.
What an amazing book and what a gent. I have kept the review short as everyone should read such a book and make up their own mind.
God bless him and all who were imprisoned and to all those who are in captivity today.
She clearly is a very talented artist, who can work/perform across multiple disciplines. Looking at her work though, I am unsure at first how she made money!
Following a man and dressing up, disguising herself, was one of her first projects. This is a cracking project well thought through, slightly insane and may even be called stalking these days.
She is not afraid to bare her soul, not body, and does so in a way which exposes herself to answers she may not like.
Her projects are attacked with a statisticians viewpoint, at times, canvassing the feelings of many a person, including in one case a parrot!!!
Her mind must always be working and looking for an artistic angle in all aspects of her life.
Suffering becomes a medium through which she can make art and must be part of the healing project and it is clearly a cathartic exercise for her. This is a common theme with artists of this ilk and one I can understand, given my own creation for my childhood memory.
I have decided to make a composite image conjured up from a number of memories. My childhood on the whole was a happy one, with great parents. Yet I was abused and it is the abuse that is the driver for this image.
- Holidays were great times
- I always wanted a dog
- Religion became important after the abuse
- Aged black and white for my memories
All three of the above points are played out in the image, which is deliberately blurred and aged, like my memories. This is partly due to the time that has passed and partly due towhead happened to me when I was about 8 years old.
I’m not sure I like the image, it reminds me of what happened, but it is how I wanted to recreate my memory, which is part of my healing process. It has left me with PTSD.
Having spent some considerable time looking at Jo Spence, I find myself pulled in different directions. Firstly I admire her bravery, her work and how she speaks (or photographs) her mind. She is like me. I say it as it is. On the other hand the Libido Uprising project is just not my cup of tea, although I do understand what she is doing and why. Jo Spence appears to have influenced Gillian Wearing, whom I encountered earlier and I am convinced she will have given strength and courage to anyone who has seen her work.
Her life is somewhat tragic, being blessed with breast cancer and then leukaemia. My heart went out to her when I read her story. The illnesses have also been a catalyst for some of her best work.
The Cancer Shock project, must have been hard to work with, but also cathartic. Is there an element of exhibitionism again in there. I’m not convinced that many people I know would bare all. I understand why this is done but again this is not my cup of tea. I’m also unsure if the general public wold understand what the project is really about or the necessity get get one kit off.
Below is my favourite image that I have seen relating to Jo’s work. My reasons for this are laid out below the image.
- I am of an age where I actually remember using Squeezy washing up liquid. It was cheap and naff.
- The images behind Jo also add to the message about the role of women in life and society.
- I’m not sure but in the capitalism works poster, the main character appears to be the macho man Clint Eastwood.
- The mask adds to the fact she is saying woman are being suppressed.
- The gloves hint at what would have been classed as “women work”.
- I think artists like Jo, will have awakened some ladies to take up the fight to strive for equality.
- She is also wearing a wedding ring to add to the fact that she belongs to a man.
- I am a believer in equality for all.
I am torn between doing some research on a number of photographers. They are ; –
- Andy Warhol
- Cindy Sherman
- Richard Avedon
- Man Ray
- Robert Mapplethorpe
- Jo Spence
Ok, I have made my choice. I am going to look at the work of Jo Spence. The reasons being, I know her work less than the others, she is a cancer sufferer,and involves herself in politics. My research will not be an in-depth study, but will be a broad brush approach, opening my eyes to a new artist, which fits in nicely with the work I am currently doing on C&N.
First thing that I want to say is that I am commenting here on the Front series (2005-2007) and nothing else.
This work is similar to Nikki Lee’s as previously commented, but for me this takes it one step further, she actually wears the clothes of the missing person within the group. She transforms into to that person. The family snap becomes the non family snap, but something from the film, The Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
They are a performance and a snap shot, that is not a snap shot, but something that is well planned, well executed and a snap shot that includes a 4×5 camera, a tripod, an expert in photography to stage the overall image. It is a great big whopping lie, with humorous and yet serous connotations.
Her work has echoes of Cindy Sherman and I am more drawn to these than the work of Nikki S Lee, possibly due to the subjects and the settings used. They also make me feel easier about the image than Lee’s work, although I can’t explain why. It’s simply a gut reaction.
I would love to know what thoughts were going through the mind of the kids in this image above. They both seem relaxed enough, although I can see some stiffness and awkwardness is Morrissey.
How would I feel if I were approached, well that would depend on who was asking, the weather and the overall project. Having seen these images I would also ask why they were recreating work that has already been done.
From now on I will discuss some of her other work.
The Failed Realist series, is simply childish expression in the form of face painting by Morrissey’s daughter, from something that she has just experienced. The paintings are pure innocence, yet to an adult they conjure up different ideas than what were intended at inception.
If this is the tooth fairy, I would hate to see the clown from It!
Clearly when viewing images our own psyche and consciousness takes over and may give the viewer a different perspective of the truth. The truth is specific to the viewer and shows how images can be interpreted.
Seven Years is a prop driven series pulling apart the traditional family photographs. It explores the differences between relatives and explore how these differences can create tension. They are all a lie that aims to give answers, but I am not sure the answers you get are the truth as the foundation for the images is does not start with the truth.
Clever work, that creates tensions that may not exist in an original image. The series are thought provoking and not displeasing to look at. They have made me think, but once more this type of work is not my bag.